Compare / Helicone vs Phoenix

Helicone vs Phoenix

Pick Helicone if you want an Apache-2.0 observability proxy. Pick Phoenix only if you accept Elastic License 2.0. Langfuse remains the published LangSmith stack.

Facts checked 21 Oct 2026. License, language, and GitHub activity come from the catalog or the project's own repo. "Not in the catalog row" means the public catalog dump does not store that number.

Helicone in the catalog Phoenix in the catalog Start on Railway

How they compare

HeliconePhoenix
LicenseApache-2.0 (catalog) sourceElastic License 2.0 (catalog) — not OSI source
LanguageTypeScript (catalog) Python (catalog)
GitHub activity6,231 stars in the catalog source11,939 stars in the catalog source
Self-hostNamed on /stacks/langfuse-observe. Proxy in front of the model API. Self-host allowed. ELv2 forbids offering it as a hosted service to third parties.
Best forAn OSI Apache-2.0 proxy. ELv2 evals if you accept that license.

Self-hosting and resource needs

Neither is the default lander. The published LangSmith path is /stacks/langfuse-observe. Helicone is Helicone/helicone. Phoenix is Arize-ai/phoenix. Do not call Phoenix the OSS path.

FAQ

Why not Langfuse?
Langfuse is the published LangSmith replacement — /compare/langfuse-vs-helicone and /compare/langfuse-vs-phoenix.
Is Phoenix open source?
Not OSI. Elastic License 2.0.
Are these free?
Helicone is Apache-2.0. Phoenix is ELv2. You pay hosting and tokens.
How do I deploy a tracer?
Start at /stacks/langfuse-observe unless you already run Helicone or Phoenix.

Related pages

Stack of the Week

Get one stack a week that replaces a SaaS bill.

Sponsor this page