Skip to content
c17 .ioJoin list

Compare / Swetrix vs Plausible

Swetrix vs Plausible

Pick Swetrix if you want the published c17 Google Analytics/Mixpanel stack. Pick Plausible if you want the well-known Elixir cookie-free alternative. Both are AGPL pageview boxes, not PostHog.

Facts checked 17 Oct 2026. License, language, and GitHub activity come from the catalog or the project's own repo. "Not in the catalog row" means the public catalog dump does not store that number.

Swetrix in the catalog Plausible in the catalogStart on Railway

How they compare

SwetrixPlausible
LicenseAGPL-3.0 (catalog) sourceAGPL-3.0 (catalog) source
LanguageTypeScript (catalog) Elixir (catalog)
GitHub activity1,204 stars in the catalog source29,518 stars in the catalog source
Self-hostPublished as /stacks/swetrix-analytics. One site + DB. Cookie-free pageviews. Official cloud exists; this page is self-host.
Best forCookieless pageviews on a content or checkout site. A small JS snippet and a simple dashboard.

Self-hosting and resource needs

Swetrix is the Easy analytics stack. Plausible is Elixir + a database (plausible/analytics). Neither replaces PostHog funnels. Umami is the MIT sibling — /compare/plausible-vs-umami.

FAQ

Why is Swetrix first?
It is the published c17 stack. Star count is not the ranking.
Swetrix or PostHog?
Swetrix for pageviews. PostHog for funnels and replay. See /compare/swetrix-vs-posthog.
Are these free?
Both catalog rows are AGPL-3.0. You pay hosting. Plausible Cloud is a separate product.
Umami?
MIT TypeScript sibling. See /compare/plausible-vs-umami.

Related pages

Stack of the Week

Get one stack a week that replaces a SaaS bill.

Sponsor this page