Compare / Logseq vs TriliumNext Notes

Logseq vs TriliumNext Notes

Pick Logseq if you want a Roam-shaped graph (the published Roam stack). Pick TriliumNext if you want a hierarchical notebook (already on /replace/evernote).

Facts checked 21 Oct 2026. License, language, and GitHub activity come from the catalog or the project's own repo. "Not in the catalog row" means the public catalog dump does not store that number.

Logseq in the catalog TriliumNext Notes in the catalog Start on Railway

How they compare

LogseqTriliumNext Notes
LicenseAGPL-3.0 (catalog) sourceGNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (catalog) source
LanguageClojure (catalog) TypeScript (catalog)
GitHub activity45,324 stars in the catalog source38,388 stars in the catalog source
Self-hostPublished as /stacks/logseq-roam. Local-first graph. Named on /stacks/memos-notes. Hierarchical notebook plus a volume.
Best forBidirectional links and daily notes. A tree of notes, not a graph.

Self-hosting and resource needs

Logseq is /stacks/logseq-roam. TriliumNext is already on /stacks/memos-notes. Joplin is /compare/logseq-vs-joplin. A team wiki stays on /replace/notion.

FAQ

Why not Memos?
Memos is MIT capture — /replace/onenote and /replace/evernote. This pair is two notebooks.
Notes or a wiki?
This pair is a personal graph or tree. A team wiki is /replace/notion (Docmost).
Are these free?
Both catalog rows are AGPL-3.0. You pay hosting or disk.
How do I deploy TriliumNext?
Open /stacks/memos-notes. Persist a volume.

Related pages

Stack of the Week

Get one stack a week that replaces a SaaS bill.

Sponsor this page